
Published:Tue, 18 May 2010 10:10:55 -0700
Tech bloggers often dismiss Hotmail, Microsofts webmail service, as an outmoded relic of the late 90s. However, its still the worlds most popular e-mail service, and the second mo......
Published:Tue, 18 May 2010 11:43:02 -0700
A former Google staffer and current White House deputy chief technology officer has been reprimanded for using a personal e-mail account for official business purposes.......
Published:Tue, 18 May 2010 19:41:38 -0700
WASHINGTON: Hotmail is getting a facelift. Microsofts free e-mail service, the worlds largest with 360 million users, added a slew of new tools and features including the ability ......
Published:Mon, 17 May 2010 22:48:59 -0700
UC Davis halted a two-month long trial of Googles Gmail earlier this month for faculty and staff due to fears regarding Googles privacy policies. However, Gmail simply has no peer......
Published:Tue, 18 May 2010 10:47:42 -0700
Microsoft has revealed a number of new details about its forthcoming update to the Hotmail e-mail service. And this is no small update with Microsoft seeming to rebuild Hotmail fr......
E-mail spoofing is a term used to describe (usually fraudulent) e-mail activity in which the sender address and other parts of the e-mail header are altered to appear as though the e-mail originated from a different source. E-mail spoofing is a technique commonly used for spam e-mail and phishing to hide the origin of an e-Mail message. By changing certain properties of the e-mail, such as the From, Return-Path and Reply-To fields (which can be found in the message header), ill-intentioned users can make the e-mail appear to be from someone other than the actual sender. The result is that, although the e-mail appears to come from the address indicated in the From field (found in the e-mail headers) it actually comes from another source.
Occasionally (especially if the spam requires a reply from the recipient, such as the '419' scams), the source of the spam e-mail is indicated in the Reply-To field (or at least a way of identifying the spammer); if this is the case and the initial e-mail is replied to, the delivery will be sent to the address specified in the Reply-To field, which could be the spammer's address. However, most spam emails (especially malicious ones with a trojan/virus payload, or those advertising a web site) forge this address too, and replying to it will annoy an innocent third party.
Prior to the advent of unsolicited commercial email as a viable business model, "legitimately spoofed" email was common. For example, a visiting user might use the local organization's smtp server to send email from the user's foreign address. Since most servers were configured as open relays, this was a common practice. As spam email became an annoying problem, most of these "legitimate" uses fell victim to antispam techniques.
Methods
Because many spammers now use special software to create random sender addresses, even if the user finds the origin of the e-mail it is unlikely that the e-mail address will be active.
The technique is now used ubiquitously by mass-mailing worms as a means of concealing the origin of the propagation. On infection, worms such as ILOVEYOU, Klez and Sober will often try to perform searches for e-mail addresses within the address book of a mail client, and use those addresses in the From field of e-mails that they send, so that these e-mails appear to have been sent by the third party. For example:
- User1 is sent an infected e-mail and then the e-mail is opened, triggering propagation
- The worm finds the addresses of User2 and User3 within the address book of User1
- From the computer of User1, the worm sends an infected e-mail to User2, but the e-mail appears to have been sent from User3
This can be particularly problematic in a corporate setting, where e-mail is sent to organisations with content filtering gateways in place. These gateways are often configured with default rules that send reply notices for messages that get blocked, so the example is often followed by:
- User2 doesn't receive the message, but instead gets a message telling him that a virus sent to them has been blocked. User3 receives a message telling him that a virus sent by them has been blocked. This creates confusion for both User2 and User3, while User1 remains unaware of the actual infection.
Newer variants of these worms have built on this technique by randomising all or part of the e-mail address. A worm can employ various methods to achieve this, including:
- Random letter generation
- Built-in wordlists
- Amalgamating addresses found in address books, for example:
- User1 triggers an e-mail address spoofing worm, and the worm finds the addresses user2@efgh.com, user3@ijkl.com and user4@mnop.com within the users e-mail address book
- The worm sends an infected message to user2@efgh.com, but the e-mail appears to have been sent from user3@mnop.com
|
Comments submitted from other visitors |
More posts, Page # :
Digg
|
Reddit
|
Mixx
|
del.icio.us
|
Stumble it! | 

